SERMON: “Who is the Antichrist? Part 2” (Dan. 11:36–45)





Who is the Antichrist? Part 2” (Dan. 11:36–45)

Series:               “Daniel: God’s Sovereign Plans” #33 Text:                 Daniel 11:36–45

By:                    Shaun Marksbury                         Date:                August 30, 2026

Venue:             Living Water Baptist Church            Occasion:          PM Service

 

Introduction

Last time, we considered that there are a lot of theories as to who the Antichrist might be.  For instance, a case being made for Henry Kissinger in the early 80s, and others were theorizing it was Mikhail Gorbachev.  These are not names known by people under a certain age, but decades ago, a generation of Christians were convinced that they might be looking at the rise of the Antichrist on television.  So, it should be no surprise that current names like Jared Kushner, Emmanuel Macron, Sam Altman, Elon Musk, and Donald Trump are among the suggested candidates today for the Antichrist.  It’s not wrong to theorize, as long as you have the humility to recognize that you are likely wrong on this side of the rapture and tribulation.

Again, the truth is that we can’t know for certain who the Antichrist is yet because 1.) if he is alive, he will be insignificant until the appointed time (cf. Dan. 7:20), and 2.) we have not reached that time yet.  Yet, there is a point at which the Antichrist will be revealed, and we noted some of his traits last week.

For instance, we saw that much about Antiochus IV is applicable to the Antichrist.  This explains why the abomination of desolation, an action committed first by Antiochus (Dan. 11:31), is said to be coming again at the end of this book (12:11), and Christ tells His disciples to watch for it (Matt 24:15; Mark 13:14).  As the Apostle John will later say, “even now many antichrists have appeared” (1 John 2:18), and there are aspects of Antiochus and other tyrants of history in the Antichrist, just as there are parallels in their opposition to God.  That’s why we can also see parallels in both Islam and the Roman Catholic Church to the spirit of Antichrist.  Still, the text would have us focus here on the similarities between him and Antiochus IV.

Now, some might object that that places a huge gap spanning millennia between vv. 35 and 36.  Yet, that’s not completely strange, as there are many smaller gaps between the other verses in this chapter.  We also saw a gap of decades back in 9:26, describing the time of the Messiah’s crucifixion and the destruction of the temple, and there is a gap of perhaps 2,000 years between vv. 26–27 of that chapter.  We’re seeing a gap including that same period here in this chapter.

So, we’ve continuing to briefly look at the final seven years of history for the Jewish people this evening, specifically considering the Antichrist is this evening.  Today, we’ll see the second point, the temporary victories of the Antichrist (vv. 40–45).

Second, the Temporary Victories of the Antichrist (vv. 40–45)

At the end time the king of the South will collide with him, and the king of the North will storm against him with chariots, with horsemen and with many ships; and he will enter countries, overflow them and pass through.  He will also enter the Beautiful Land, and many countries will fall; but these will be rescued out of his hand: Edom, Moab and the foremost of the sons of Ammon.  Then he will stretch out his hand against other countries, and the land of Egypt will not escape.  But he will gain control over the hidden treasures of gold and silver and over all the precious things of Egypt; and Libyans and Ethiopians will follow at his heels.  But rumors from the East and from the North will disturb him, and he will go forth with great wrath to destroy and annihilate many.  He will pitch the tents of his royal pavilion between the seas and the beautiful Holy Mountain; yet he will come to his end, and no one will help him.

Verse 40 is a vital part of understanding when this is — it’s at “the end time.”  Daniel is not merely describing another conflict between Egypt and Syria.  Earlier in the chapter, Daniel spoke about an appointed time.  And now, in vv. 36–45, we have moved to the mountain peak on the eschatological horizon, the end time.

We read that, at this time, “the king of the South will collide with him.”  Now, we might think that the “king of the South” is referring to one of the Ptolemies, but remember that this is future and probably just refers to the region of Egypt.  This will be some power at that time from that region — perhaps including the Libyans and Nubians (v. 43).  That would keep the power relatively Southern to Israel.

Perhaps this is an attack against Israel, with whom the Antichrist has a covenant.  In that case, that would be an attack against him.[1]  In other words, there will be a southern power capable of challenging the Antichrist.

After this comes the attack from the king of the North.  Now there is some debate concerning his identity.  Some interpreters identify this king with the Antichrist himself.[2]  Others understand the king of the South and king of the North as two separate powers that simultaneously attack the Antichrist.[3]

There is good reason for distinguishing the king of the North from the Antichrist.  In vv. 36–39, the Antichrist is simply called “the king;” earlier in the chapter the Seleucid rulers were repeatedly called “the king of the North.”[4]  Furthermore, Daniel 7 identifies the final Antichrist with the little horn arising from the fourth kingdom, not the Greek kingdom represented by the earlier kings of the North. 

The Antichrist will be confronted by powerful enemies, and he will overcome them.  The language is deliberately overwhelming: There are chariots, horsemen, and many ships.  He enters countries, overflows, and passes through them.  The picture is one of military movement on an enormous scale.

Now, the ancient imagery of chariots, etc. naturally communicates military might.  In our modern context, of course, we don’t expect the Antichrist to literally to conquer the world using horses.  Rather, the prophetic imagery describes military power and warfare, meaning we could reasonably expect this to include armies, armored forces, air power, naval fleets, missiles, drones, and the machinery of modern warfare.[5]  The point is that he is dangerous and seemingly unstoppable.

Verse 41 says, “He will also enter the Beautiful Land, and many countries will fall.”  Again, this seems to make it clear that the Antichrist is someone other than the king of the North.  He enters Israel (cf. 8:9; 11:16), the geographic center of everything, and he will conquer.

And yet, even in the midst of this sweeping conquest, there will be exceptions.  Daniel says that “these will be rescued out of his hand: Edom, Moab and the foremost of the sons of Ammon.”  These are ancient territories southeast of Israel, historically the enemies of Israel,[6] corresponding broadly to what is today the territory of Jordan.[7]  The antichrist will not invade these areas, and the text doesn’t say why.

Perhaps because he is allied with them.[8]  But, the text doesn’t say.  There is a lesson there for us.  Sometimes Christians become so fascinated with prophecy that we begin filling in every blank.  But, the wise student of Scripture knows the difference between what the Bible says, what can reasonably be inferred, and what is merely speculation.

These escape, but others do not according to v. 42.  These would be the region associated with the king of the South — Egypt, Libya, and Ethiopia.[9]  Again, it’s speculation, but this might be an “Arab bloc led by Egypt.”[10] 

Whatever the case, the Antichrist will capture more money and control.  This will continue to increase his ability to dominate the world. 

However, these are only temporary victories.  The Lord is still sovereign, and He will bring the Antichrist to a stop.  And, it begins with rumors.

V. 44 notes the shift.  It seems the Antichrist receives intelligence about a growing and powerful opposition from the East and North.  We can’t say with certainty exactly what these reports are.  It may be that they’re related to massive armies described in Revelation 9:16 and with the sixth bowl judgment in Revelation 16:12–16.[11]  Revelation describes the Euphrates being dried up so that the way is prepared for the kings from the east. 

These armies will deploy in the Palestinian theater, including the Antichrist.[12]  This is the preparation for the great war of Armageddon.[13]  The antichrist will engage in battle and destroy many in his rage.  It appears at the moment that he will continue to have victory.

And yet, notice something else.  His anger is itself evidence that his kingdom is not secure.  He’s reacting, defensive and disturbed.  The man who appears to be in complete control is not actually in control, for only God is sovereign.

According to v. 45, he is there with his army.  He pitches his tent.  As one study notes, “When campaigning, the army lived in tents.  The king’s tent would serve as his royal residence if he accompanied the army, and would be quite lavish.”[14]  And where is this?

The Antichrist seems to be using Israel as his royal headquarters.  The “seas” most naturally refer to the Mediterranean Sea and the Dead Sea, with the “beautiful Holy Mountain” referring to Mount Zion and Jerusalem.[15]  This is particularly significant because Jerusalem is ultimately the city from which Jesus Christ will reign in His earthly kingdom.  It’s as though the Antichrist is posing as Jesus.[16]

The usurper sits in the place that belongs to Christ.  Paul describes the man of lawlessness in 2 Thessalonians 2:4 as the one who “takes his seat in the temple of God, displaying himself as being God.”  He wants what belongs to God.

But Daniel tells us it ends: “Yet he will come to his end.”  That is one of the most comforting statements in the entire passage!  After all the armies, all the victories, all the wealth, all the conquest, all the blasphemy, all the terror, there is a simple sentence: He will come to his end.  The Antichrist does not win.

The kingdoms of this world ultimately give way to the kingdom of the Son of Man.  Paul says in 2 Thessalonians 2:8 that the man of lawlessness will be slain by the Lord Jesus “with the breath of His mouth and bring to an end by the appearance of His coming.”   Revelation 19 gives us the climactic picture of Christ’s return, where He defeats the armies gathered against Him, and He throws the antichrist alive into the lake of fire.  Daniel gives us the same basic truth here.

And Daniel adds that “no one will help him.”  He will have no allies remaining, and no power of man (or angels) will save him.  No amount of wealth will purchase his escape.  No one can help him.

Why?  Because when God brings judgment, there is nowhere to hide.

Conclusion

Scripture calls us to live with confidence because history is not spinning out of control.  God has already written the conclusion!  Daniel 11 ends with the Antichrist coming to his end, and the next chapter immediately moves into the resurrection and the ultimate destiny of God’s people.  The Antichrist’s kingdom ends, while Christ’s kingdom does not.

The point of prophecy is not to become obsessed with world events, trying to find prophetic significance in every gust of wind.  The point is purifying trust in the Word of God.  We should so treasure the Scripture that we allow it to transform us by obeying it.  The Holy Spirit gives us the strength, but only if we walk in faith behind this Bible lamp.



[1] J. Dwight Pentecost, The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures, 1985, 1, 1371.

[2] Stephen R. Miller, Daniel, The New American Commentary, (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1994), 18:309.

[3] Pentecost, 1372.

[4] Miller, 18:309–310.

[5] Ibid., 18:309.

[6] Earl D. Radmacher, Ronald Barclay Allen, and H. Wayne House, The Nelson Study Bible: New King James Version, (Nashville: T. Nelson Publishers, 1997), Da 11:41–43.

[7] Pentecost.

[8] Miller, 18:311.

[9] Radmacher, et. al.

[10] Miller.

[11] Pentecost.

[12] John MacArthur Jr., Ed., The MacArthur Study Bible, electronic ed., (Nashville, TN: Word Pub., 1997), 1249.

[13] Charles Caldwell Ryrie, Basic Theology: A Popular Systematic Guide to Understanding Biblical Truth, (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1999), 554.

[14] John D. Barry, Douglas Mangum, Derek R. Brown, Michael S. Heiser, Miles Custis, Elliot Ritzema, Matthew M. Whitehead, Michael R. Grigoni, and David Bomar, Faithlife Study Bible, (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012, 2016), Da 11:45.

[15] Pentecost.

[16] Ibid.


Popular posts from this blog

SERMON: “Some Fatherly Discipline” (1 Cor. 4:14–21)

SERMON: “Call to Repentance” (James 4:7–10)

SERMON: “Believing Without Seeing” (John 20:24–31)