SERMON: “Applying the Royal Law” (James 2:8–13)





Applying the Royal Law” (James 2:8–13)

Series:               “James: True Faith Works” #11      Text:                 James 2:8–13

By:                    Shaun Marksbury                         Date:                December 29, 2024

Venue: Living Water Baptist Church                        Occasion:          PM Service

 

I.              Introduction

Last time, we saw that there was a serious problem with partialism in the church.  People were favoring rich over poor.  Sadly, such partiality is not a relic of history; it persists today.  Churches often cater to higher tax brackets. 

Moreover, there are other kinds of partiality throughout history, with some churches targeting specific people groups, like unbelievers only, or young people.  Some people look for churches with a specific culture or genre; I’m not trying to call anybody out, but there are over 5,000 “cowboy churches” in America, for example.  Some Christians also believe churches must have certain ethnic makeups to be valid churches, saying that churches must exactly mirror population demographics.

The royal law is God’s Law, the commands of the King of Kings and Lord of Lords.  We should seek to obey it.  Thus, we’ll see three points this evening: we’ll first see the love of the King in the law (vv. 8–9).  We’ll then see guilt before the King in the law (vv. 10–11).  Finally, we’ll see the mercy of the King in the law (vv. 12–13).

II.           First, the Love of the King in the Law (vv. 8–9)

If, however, you are fulfilling the royal law according to the Scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing well.  But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors.

We don’t often think of love as part of the law of God.  In fact, I’ve seen Christians mistakenly say that we need to stay out of the Old Testament, that all we need is Jesus saying, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”  Jesus (and now James) is quoting from the Book of Leviticus, though!

There are many examples of God’s love in the law.  For instance, there were laws protecting the destitute, commanding farmers to leave the corners of fields as a food source for the needy.  There were also commands about dealing with civil matters, such as difficult animals or starting fires.  The law commanded parapets around roofs, railing to protect people who might want to rest top of the upper story of homes.  There were numerous examples of caring for neighbors in Scripture.

How does this apply in the New Testament era?  James begins by commending those who “fulfill the royal law.”  This is a term that signifies the law’s connection to a king or a ruler, coming from ancient Roman culture.[1]  Of course, James applies it to King Jesus.  The term for “royal” is also similar to the term for “kingdom” in v. 5, so it works well in this context.

James’s “royal law” is not new.  Again, it comes from Leviticus 19:18, where God commanded Israel to love their neighbors as themselves.  Jesus affirmed this as the second greatest commandment, alongside loving God with all one’s heart, soul, and mind (Matthew 22:36–40).  This also matches His “golden rule” of Matthew 7:12, “In everything, therefore, treat people the same way you want them to treat you, for this is the Law and the Prophets.”  This is the law as King Jesus has taught it.

Sometimes, people get confused and believe the command “You shall love your neighbor as yourself” is two laws — you must love yourself and then love your neighbor.  This is part of the exaltation of self, and it’s all throughout Christian therapeutic and psychoanalytical circles.  I’ve heard many inmates over the years tell me, “I discovered I couldn’t love others because I never knew how to love myself,” but they didn’t realize that seeking selfish desires is the reason they were in there.  This is a grave misunderstanding; Jesus calls this one command, and the best understanding here is that we should put others before ourselves.  We should love our neighbors instead of ourselves, putting the needs of others above our own.

We’ve noted that love permeates God’s law.  Yet, love is not merely about emotion or personal preference.  As the MacArthur Study Bible notes, “This sovereign law…summarizes all the Law and the Prophets”[2] (cf. Romans 13:8–10).  Genuine love puts others before self, striving for their physical and spiritual well-being.  

How does this connect to what we’ve been considering?  That brings us to v. 9.  Favoritism means to lift the face, as though you reserve judgment until you see what the person looks like; the KJV translates this, “respect to persons.” 

Showing favoritism — like preferring the wealthy over the poor — betrays the unconditional love of God.  It prioritizes personal gain over the needs of others.  It’s a love for self first, not a love for neighbor instead of self.

Furthermore, James highlights that partiality is not a trivial matter; it is sin.  Favoritism convicts us as transgressors of God’s law.  As believers, we must reflect the love of our King, loving all without bias or discrimination.

We see the love of God throughout the Law.  However, we may also see how we are failing to love as we should.  That brings us to a point of guilt, which is where James also moves next in the text.

III.        Second, the Guilt before the King in the Law (vv. 10–11)

For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles in one point, he has become guilty of all.  For He who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not commit murder.” Now if you do not commit adultery, but do commit murder, you have become a transgressor of the law.

Sometimes, people think we can gain righteousness for ourselves by keeping some of the law.  Perhaps they adopt a kosher lifestyle, or they try to keep some of the Old Testament feasts and festivals in a Christian manner.  Maybe they strive to keep the Ten Commandments thinking that their obedience will grant them better standing with God.  However, we see the bad news here that even a single violation makes us guilty of the entire law.

James turns to the seriousness of guilt before God’s law.  Some might dismiss partiality as minor compared to big sins like murder or adultery.  As one commentator notes, “James was aware there would be some who would tend to dismiss their offense of prejudice as a trivial fault.  They would hardly consider themselves as lawbreakers.  James went on to make it clear that this was no small offense.”[3]

James dismantles such thinking by emphasizing the unity of God’s law.  It is not a collection of separate commands but an indivisible whole.  Breaking one part—no matter how small—renders one guilty of breaking all.

As an aside, this raises the question of how this whole passage should be understood within the framework of broader covenantal theology and dispensational thought.  Covenant theologians who affirm the ongoing Covenant of Works argue that this passage underscores the universal application of God’s moral law, reflecting the same standard initially given to Adam in Genesis 2:16–17.  They see verse 10, which highlights guilt for breaking even a single commandment, as evidence of the Covenant of Works’ enduring principle: perfect obedience is required to stand before a holy God. 

Modified and progressive dispensationalists, on the other hand, approach the text differently, interpreting it through the lens of kingdom ethics.  They see the “royal law” (v. 8) as expressing God’s moral demands in light of Christ's inaugurated kingdom, which believers are called to reflect while recognizing that the ultimate fulfillment of this ethic lies in the future consummation of the kingdom.

If you are not familiar with these varying theological camps, you probably don’t have a dog in that fight.  Still, you rightly wonder how to best understand this.  Despite these differing perspectives, there is significant unity among theologians regarding certain truths here.  All agree that the law reveals God’s righteous standard and humanity’s universal guilt, showing that no one can keep the law perfectly.  This passage highlights the unity and comprehensiveness of God’s law, demonstrating that to violate even one part is to stand condemned as a lawbreaker.  It also points to humanity's need for a Savior, as no one can meet the law’s demands apart from Christ.  Finally, there is shared agreement that believers, though forgiven, are still called to live in light of God’s moral standards, striving to reflect His character while relying on His grace.

The point here isn’t to try harder.  James 3:2 says, “For we all stumble in many ways.  Sin shatters the unity of the law, much like breaking one section of a stained-glass window ruins the entire piece.  This guilt points us to our need for Christ’s perfect righteousness.  We are only Christians by the grace of Christ (cf. Jude 24), so we should show that grace to others. 

This principle also refutes the idea that partial obedience can earn favor with God.  Attempts to keep parts of the law — whether dietary restrictions, feasts, or the Ten Commandments — cannot atone for our failures.  As James highlights, even one stumble leaves us liable for all, underscoring our need for a Savior.

Moreover, James’ reference to murder and adultery reminds us that selective obedience is insufficient.  These are not merely individual sins; they represent rebellion against the Lawgiver Himself.  God demands complete, consistent obedience. 

Of course, this is an impossible standard apart from grace.  Thus, believers must rest in Christ’s righteousness, who fulfilled the law perfectly on our behalf (Matthew 5:17).  Just as we cannot deal with our guilt on our own, we believe and rest in the grace and mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ for eternal life.  If we claim to know this already, then we should be people who practice mercy.  That’s where James turns next.

IV.        Third, the Mercy of the King in the Law (vv. 12–13)

So speak and so act as those who are to be judged by the law of liberty. For judgment will be merciless to one who has shown no mercy; mercy triumphs over judgment.

With what we’ve learned so far, we should be ready to apply it.  We should be people seeking to apply eternal kingdom principles from the Law of the King to our lives.  There is plenty of love and mercy to be seen in the Law.  As such, we should practice mercy toward one another, especially toward those who are in need.

James concludes by calling believers to apply the law of liberty in their speech and actions.  The terms here indicate habitual action.[4]  Christians should strive by the power of the Holy Spirit to make this an ongoing trait of speech and action.

This “law of liberty” obviously parallels the “royal law” above, but it emphasizes that submission to the King provides true freedom.  This liberty is found in obeying God’s Word, which is why James also calls it the perfect law (cf. James 1:25).  Far from oppressive, God’s commands bring freedom from sin and its consequences.

A person who embraces sin might feel free for a while.  However, that person will find less ability to interact with others like he or she used to do.  Eventually, it may become all life-consuming that it may result in inescapable consequences like disease, arrest, or even death, depending on the circumstances.  There is no true freedom in sin.  God’s perfect revelation to us shows us how we must live to have true freedom.

Believers are to live as those who will stand before Christ’s judgment seat.  Though believers are secure in salvation, our deeds will be evaluated (2 Corinthians 5:10).  James warns that judgment will be merciless to those who show no mercy.  Many verses link the concept of not showing compassion to coming judgment (Prov 21:13; Matt 5:7; 18:32–35; Luke 6:37–38).  In fact, it may be that the person who continually refuses to show compassion for the poor or some other personally disfavored people group prove that they are false believers, which means they certainly will have no mercy in the judgment of God.

Christians, who are born sinners should be people who understand mercy.  As another study notes, “Failure to show mercy means a failure to understand God’s mercy.” [5]  This echoes Jesus’ teaching: “Blessed are the merciful, for they will receive mercy” (Matthew 5:7).  Christians should reflect the same mercy that we have received from the King, a mercy which should transform our hearts.

James declares, “Mercy triumphs over judgment.”  This is both a precious and a cutting reminder.  This victory is not about excusing sin but about demonstrating the power of God’s mercy in a believer’s life.  A heart characterized by mercy provides evidence of genuine faith and readiness for the day of judgment.

V.           Conclusion

God’s law calls us to perfection.  Yet, as James reveals, we all fall short.  Thankfully, Christ’s active obedience — His perfect fulfillment of the law — is credited to us by faith.  This grace frees us from the law’s condemnation and empowers us to live by the royal law of love.

As we reflect on this passage, let’s:

  • Love impartially, reflecting the heart of our King.
  • Acknowledge our guilt and rest in Christ’s righteousness.
  • Show mercy, living as those transformed by God’s grace.

In doing so, we apply the royal law, honoring the King who first loved us.  May our lives shine as testimonies to His mercy and love!



[1] A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament, (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933), Jas 2:8.

[2] John MacArthur Jr., Ed., The MacArthur Study Bible, electronic ed., (Nashville, TN: Word Pub., 1997), 1929.

[3] J. Ronald Blue, The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures, 1985, 2, 825.

[4] Ibid.

[5] John D. Barry, Douglas Mangum, Derek R. Brown, Michael S. Heiser, Miles Custis, Elliot Ritzema, Matthew M. Whitehead, Michael R. Grigoni, and David Bomar, Faithlife Study Bible, (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012, 2016), Jas 2:13.


Popular posts from this blog

Controversy about Alistair Begg and Gay Weddings?

Caution regarding the teaching of Lysa Terkeurst

Serious Concern for Colorado Public Schools